<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ignore Past Performance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.investingintelligently.com/2007/04/28/ignore-past-performance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.investingintelligently.com/2007/04/28/ignore-past-performance/</link>
	<description>Not just another (Canadian) financial blog</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: This and That</title>
		<link>http://www.investingintelligently.com/2007/04/28/ignore-past-performance/#comment-6921</link>
		<dc:creator>This and That</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 22:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investingintelligently.com/2007/04/28/ignore-past-performance/#comment-6921</guid>
		<description>[...] Investing Intelligently has rightly panned Rob Carrick&#8217;s quest to seek out hot mutual funds. Reams of research shows that past performance is a poor indicator of future returns (which is what new investors get) and a hot fund rarely keeps outperforming. So, why bother? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Investing Intelligently has rightly panned Rob Carrick&#8217;s quest to seek out hot mutual funds. Reams of research shows that past performance is a poor indicator of future returns (which is what new investors get) and a hot fund rarely keeps outperforming. So, why bother? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
