<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sleepy Passive Index ETF up 14.7% in 2006</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.investingintelligently.com/2007/01/01/sleepy-passive-index-etf-up-147-in-2006/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.investingintelligently.com/2007/01/01/sleepy-passive-index-etf-up-147-in-2006/</link>
	<description>Not just another (Canadian) financial blog</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 18:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Capitalist &#187; Do as I say, Not as I do?</title>
		<link>http://www.investingintelligently.com/2007/01/01/sleepy-passive-index-etf-up-147-in-2006/#comment-4582</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Capitalist &#187; Do as I say, Not as I do?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 03:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investingintelligently.com/2007/01/01/sleepy-passive-index-etf-up-147-in-2006/#comment-4582</guid>
		<description>[...] Dave at Investing Intelligently noticed that my benchmark Sleepy Portfolio returned a stellar 14.7% in 2006 and asked the obvious question: Why do I even bother with individual stocks instead of taking a passive approach using ETFs? It is a good question and as a matter of fact, I am slowly increasing the percentage of portfolio that is indexed. However, there are some very good reasons why I am not getting there sooner: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dave at Investing Intelligently noticed that my benchmark Sleepy Portfolio returned a stellar 14.7% in 2006 and asked the obvious question: Why do I even bother with individual stocks instead of taking a passive approach using ETFs? It is a good question and as a matter of fact, I am slowly increasing the percentage of portfolio that is indexed. However, there are some very good reasons why I am not getting there sooner: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Capitalist</title>
		<link>http://www.investingintelligently.com/2007/01/01/sleepy-passive-index-etf-up-147-in-2006/#comment-4552</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Capitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 15:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investingintelligently.com/2007/01/01/sleepy-passive-index-etf-up-147-in-2006/#comment-4552</guid>
		<description>I'll post about the details of my plan: 

- become completely indexed in bonds, US and International equities. 
- I will pick stocks to represent my Canadian equity allocation.
- Most of my US equities were purchased years ago; I will be selling them as opportunity presents and buy ETFs with the proceeds.
- as I mentioned in my report card, a bigger % of our portfolios is now indexed compared to last year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll post about the details of my plan: </p>
<p>- become completely indexed in bonds, US and International equities.<br />
- I will pick stocks to represent my Canadian equity allocation.<br />
- Most of my US equities were purchased years ago; I will be selling them as opportunity presents and buy ETFs with the proceeds.<br />
- as I mentioned in my report card, a bigger % of our portfolios is now indexed compared to last year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
