<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Realtor Gets a Rude Awakening</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.investingintelligently.com/2006/08/04/a-realtor-gets-a-rude-awakening/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.investingintelligently.com/2006/08/04/a-realtor-gets-a-rude-awakening/</link>
	<description>Not just another (Canadian) financial blog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 23:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.investingintelligently.com/2006/08/04/a-realtor-gets-a-rude-awakening/#comment-1261</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 06:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investingintelligently.com/2006/08/04/a-realtor-gets-a-rude-awakening/#comment-1261</guid>
		<description>Hey Mmm... Life...: I'm totally hoping for a crash in housing prices so that I can get a better deal on a place. But whether or not prices will crash big time or stay flat, I'm not really sure. I am guessing that they will have to come down at least some, even just based on the fact that interest rates are climbing meaning the average Joe won't be able to get approved for the same amount that he could a few years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Mmm&#8230; Life&#8230;: I&#8217;m totally hoping for a crash in housing prices so that I can get a better deal on a place. But whether or not prices will crash big time or stay flat, I&#8217;m not really sure. I am guessing that they will have to come down at least some, even just based on the fact that interest rates are climbing meaning the average Joe won&#8217;t be able to get approved for the same amount that he could a few years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meadow</title>
		<link>http://www.investingintelligently.com/2006/08/04/a-realtor-gets-a-rude-awakening/#comment-1255</link>
		<dc:creator>Meadow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 00:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investingintelligently.com/2006/08/04/a-realtor-gets-a-rude-awakening/#comment-1255</guid>
		<description>No real alternatives to an actual brick and mortar building if you want to own a place to live.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No real alternatives to an actual brick and mortar building if you want to own a place to live.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mmm... Life...</title>
		<link>http://www.investingintelligently.com/2006/08/04/a-realtor-gets-a-rude-awakening/#comment-1124</link>
		<dc:creator>Mmm... Life...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 11:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investingintelligently.com/2006/08/04/a-realtor-gets-a-rude-awakening/#comment-1124</guid>
		<description>I think the increasing press in the last couple years about the impending collapse of the real estate economy is a bit overhyped.  Real estate trends in relatively long cycles and its pretty hard for it to bottom out immediately like naysayers seem to be predicting.

Remember, there exist alternatives to actual brick and morter buildings.  For example, housing futures offer a way to put on regional spreads as a way to capitalize on the difference in growth rates of different regional housing markets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the increasing press in the last couple years about the impending collapse of the real estate economy is a bit overhyped.  Real estate trends in relatively long cycles and its pretty hard for it to bottom out immediately like naysayers seem to be predicting.</p>
<p>Remember, there exist alternatives to actual brick and morter buildings.  For example, housing futures offer a way to put on regional spreads as a way to capitalize on the difference in growth rates of different regional housing markets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.investingintelligently.com/2006/08/04/a-realtor-gets-a-rude-awakening/#comment-1008</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2006 02:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investingintelligently.com/2006/08/04/a-realtor-gets-a-rude-awakening/#comment-1008</guid>
		<description>But if you just look at the house prices out there, then look at the income required to get a mortgage for 75% of the cost of that home, then look at the gross monthly income required to get approved for such a loan and it is insanely high. I don't know how things cannot swing back, at least not without salaries suddenly increasing. I'm just expecting the worse that's all, because that's my nature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But if you just look at the house prices out there, then look at the income required to get a mortgage for 75% of the cost of that home, then look at the gross monthly income required to get approved for such a loan and it is insanely high. I don&#8217;t know how things cannot swing back, at least not without salaries suddenly increasing. I&#8217;m just expecting the worse that&#8217;s all, because that&#8217;s my nature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: silverm</title>
		<link>http://www.investingintelligently.com/2006/08/04/a-realtor-gets-a-rude-awakening/#comment-1005</link>
		<dc:creator>silverm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2006 18:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investingintelligently.com/2006/08/04/a-realtor-gets-a-rude-awakening/#comment-1005</guid>
		<description>&#62;&#62;"40% of all home buying in both 2004 and 2005 was for second homes or for “investments”. "

The ratio between homes occupied by homeowners vs tenants has always been around 2:1.  40% investment buying for marginal buyers is high, but that high.  I think the market will likely stay flat instead of a major correction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;&#8221;40% of all home buying in both 2004 and 2005 was for second homes or for “investments”. &#8221;</p>
<p>The ratio between homes occupied by homeowners vs tenants has always been around 2:1.  40% investment buying for marginal buyers is high, but that high.  I think the market will likely stay flat instead of a major correction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
