<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A House is an Asset</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.investingintelligently.com/2006/03/29/a-house-is-an-asset/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.investingintelligently.com/2006/03/29/a-house-is-an-asset/</link>
	<description>Not just another (Canadian) financial blog</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 09:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.investingintelligently.com/2006/03/29/a-house-is-an-asset/#comment-273</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Apr 2006 18:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investingintelligently.com/2006/03/29/a-house-is-an-asset/#comment-273</guid>
		<description>Sorry Doug that is flat out wrong. Saying that because "your house creates expenses, you should consider it a liability" is ridiculous.

Gold bars create expenses as well as I need some place to store them, preferably in some secure storage that will cost money. By your logic a gold bar is a liability. I do not even want to try to defend the statement that a gold bar is a liability.

If you want to get technical, every expense could technically  be paid from an accounts payable (which is a liability) which is then paid off from an asset (cash). So these expenses are liabilities but the house isn't.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Doug that is flat out wrong. Saying that because &#8220;your house creates expenses, you should consider it a liability&#8221; is ridiculous.</p>
<p>Gold bars create expenses as well as I need some place to store them, preferably in some secure storage that will cost money. By your logic a gold bar is a liability. I do not even want to try to defend the statement that a gold bar is a liability.</p>
<p>If you want to get technical, every expense could technically  be paid from an accounts payable (which is a liability) which is then paid off from an asset (cash). So these expenses are liabilities but the house isn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Pedersen</title>
		<link>http://www.investingintelligently.com/2006/03/29/a-house-is-an-asset/#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Pedersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Apr 2006 02:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investingintelligently.com/2006/03/29/a-house-is-an-asset/#comment-272</guid>
		<description>It costs money to live in your house, even if your mortgage (your *financial* liability) is zero.  This is because, like food, water and other basic necessities, housing is not free.  You should see yourself as a consumer of housing.  Since your house creates expenses, you should consider it a liability, even though it has value.  The problem is, if you realize this value, you now need to pay for somewhere else to live.  I suppose it could also be considered an expense, like rent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It costs money to live in your house, even if your mortgage (your *financial* liability) is zero.  This is because, like food, water and other basic necessities, housing is not free.  You should see yourself as a consumer of housing.  Since your house creates expenses, you should consider it a liability, even though it has value.  The problem is, if you realize this value, you now need to pay for somewhere else to live.  I suppose it could also be considered an expense, like rent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prasanth</title>
		<link>http://www.investingintelligently.com/2006/03/29/a-house-is-an-asset/#comment-249</link>
		<dc:creator>Prasanth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 09:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investingintelligently.com/2006/03/29/a-house-is-an-asset/#comment-249</guid>
		<description>As long as i'm going to live in the house i own, even if its is mortgage free, the house is an asset with zero value. After all, i do need a house to live in. On the other hand, if i own another property, then it is an asset with some value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as i&#8217;m going to live in the house i own, even if its is mortgage free, the house is an asset with zero value. After all, i do need a house to live in. On the other hand, if i own another property, then it is an asset with some value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DIY Finances &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Asset with Liability Written All Over it</title>
		<link>http://www.investingintelligently.com/2006/03/29/a-house-is-an-asset/#comment-248</link>
		<dc:creator>DIY Finances &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Asset with Liability Written All Over it</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 01:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investingintelligently.com/2006/03/29/a-house-is-an-asset/#comment-248</guid>
		<description>[...] There is quite the debate (Canadian Capitalist and InvestingIntelligently) going on about whether or not your primary residence is an asset or a liability. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There is quite the debate (Canadian Capitalist and InvestingIntelligently) going on about whether or not your primary residence is an asset or a liability. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Capitalist</title>
		<link>http://www.investingintelligently.com/2006/03/29/a-house-is-an-asset/#comment-247</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Capitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 20:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investingintelligently.com/2006/03/29/a-house-is-an-asset/#comment-247</guid>
		<description>Of course, a house is an asset. Anything that can be converted to cash (sooner or later) is an asset. In my post I am simply pointing out that when people argue that it is a liability, they forget to take the imputed rent into account.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, a house is an asset. Anything that can be converted to cash (sooner or later) is an asset. In my post I am simply pointing out that when people argue that it is a liability, they forget to take the imputed rent into account.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tonekoffski</title>
		<link>http://www.investingintelligently.com/2006/03/29/a-house-is-an-asset/#comment-246</link>
		<dc:creator>tonekoffski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 16:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investingintelligently.com/2006/03/29/a-house-is-an-asset/#comment-246</guid>
		<description>"If I have a personal residence that costs $1 million but will rent for only $1,000 a month, should it be counted as an asset worth $1 million?"

Where's the confusion here? Of course it should be counted as an asset. Only the corresponding mortgage is a liability. 

Why would the fact that you are collecting $1000 rental income per month change whether or not you classify your house as an asset? Your house is an asset (fixed asset); the $1000 rental income is an asset (cash); and your mortgage is a liability (long-term liability).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If I have a personal residence that costs $1 million but will rent for only $1,000 a month, should it be counted as an asset worth $1 million?&#8221;</p>
<p>Where&#8217;s the confusion here? Of course it should be counted as an asset. Only the corresponding mortgage is a liability. </p>
<p>Why would the fact that you are collecting $1000 rental income per month change whether or not you classify your house as an asset? Your house is an asset (fixed asset); the $1000 rental income is an asset (cash); and your mortgage is a liability (long-term liability).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 0xCC</title>
		<link>http://www.investingintelligently.com/2006/03/29/a-house-is-an-asset/#comment-244</link>
		<dc:creator>0xCC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 12:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investingintelligently.com/2006/03/29/a-house-is-an-asset/#comment-244</guid>
		<description>What if you were to sell that $1 million house and then turn around and rent it from the buyer for $1000 a month?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if you were to sell that $1 million house and then turn around and rent it from the buyer for $1000 a month?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Capitalist</title>
		<link>http://www.investingintelligently.com/2006/03/29/a-house-is-an-asset/#comment-243</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Capitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 12:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investingintelligently.com/2006/03/29/a-house-is-an-asset/#comment-243</guid>
		<description>Like I mention in my post, many people fail to account for the value that they derive from the personal residence. But the liability argument side does have a point. If I have a personal residence that costs $1 million but will rent for only $1,000 a month, should it be counted as an asset worth $1 million?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like I mention in my post, many people fail to account for the value that they derive from the personal residence. But the liability argument side does have a point. If I have a personal residence that costs $1 million but will rent for only $1,000 a month, should it be counted as an asset worth $1 million?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
