<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bill Miller Beats S&amp;P 500 for 15th Consecutive Year</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.investingintelligently.com/2006/01/10/bill-miller-beats-sp-500-for-15th-consecutive-year/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.investingintelligently.com/2006/01/10/bill-miller-beats-sp-500-for-15th-consecutive-year/</link>
	<description>Not just another (Canadian) financial blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2010 15:22:19 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Investing Intelligently &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Non-Market Cap Weighted Indexes: The Next Big Thing</title>
		<link>http://www.investingintelligently.com/2006/01/10/bill-miller-beats-sp-500-for-15th-consecutive-year/comment-page-1/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>Investing Intelligently &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Non-Market Cap Weighted Indexes: The Next Big Thing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 21:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investingintelligently.com/?p=143#comment-139</guid>
		<description>[...] I can see non-market cap weighted indexes becoming more popular in the future, if only because of their better past performance. We all know people&#8217;s insatiable thirst for better performance, and it is clear that non-market cap indexes have given better performance in the past as I showed here and here. When the market has it&#8217;s next significantly large drop/crash, average investors will invariably sell positions in market-cap weighted ETFs and index funds and when the market comes around again, will look for other places to put their money, chasing performance. I think passive non-market cap based indexing will be the next big thing. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I can see non-market cap weighted indexes becoming more popular in the future, if only because of their better past performance. We all know people&#8217;s insatiable thirst for better performance, and it is clear that non-market cap indexes have given better performance in the past as I showed here and here. When the market has it&#8217;s next significantly large drop/crash, average investors will invariably sell positions in market-cap weighted ETFs and index funds and when the market comes around again, will look for other places to put their money, chasing performance. I think passive non-market cap based indexing will be the next big thing. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.investingintelligently.com/2006/01/10/bill-miller-beats-sp-500-for-15th-consecutive-year/comment-page-1/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 00:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investingintelligently.com/?p=143#comment-76</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s true, I had forgot about the MER, so yes, it is even more of an accomplishment. Too bad he hasn&#039;t beaten RSP as well!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s true, I had forgot about the MER, so yes, it is even more of an accomplishment. Too bad he hasn&#8217;t beaten RSP as well!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loi Tran</title>
		<link>http://www.investingintelligently.com/2006/01/10/bill-miller-beats-sp-500-for-15th-consecutive-year/comment-page-1/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Loi Tran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 20:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investingintelligently.com/?p=143#comment-75</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a quite an accomplishment considering the high expense ratio of 1.68.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a quite an accomplishment considering the high expense ratio of 1.68.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

